RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General (L494) > 5.0 V8 Supercharged Real World Distance Between Fill-Ups
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
 
nil07



Member Since: 05 Apr 2015
Location: london
Posts: 115

United Kingdom 2013 Range Rover Sport SDV6 Autobiography Bonatti Grey

I get between 16 and 21 on svr N

E46 M3
X6
2015 RRS HSE dynamic
2018 RRS Autobiography
2019 SVR

Post #603985 Tue Sep 01 2020 1:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Smarttech



Member Since: 11 Jan 2017
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 424

United Kingdom 


This was mine after a long run but only managed to get £100 in it which at the time was about 80 litres
At one point on the motorway it was reading 30 mpg but this soon dropped once back in to town.
Round town I'm seeing 16-20 mpg. 2017 SVR. SVO Scafell grey Ebony interior
2012 3.0 SDV6 Autobiography santorini black with ebony/cirrus interior. Gone


Last edited by Smarttech on Wed Sep 02 2020 7:35pm. Edited 1 time in total

Post #604006 Wed Sep 02 2020 6:44am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Jjvd21



Member Since: 20 Dec 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 239

United States 

663 km (416 miles) between fill ups yesterday. Averaged 20.9 mpg in 95% highway driving in 5 hours 41 minutes. 2020 SVR / R.I.P. 2019 SVR / 2016 D4 Landmark / 2005 D3 HSE

Post #604035 Wed Sep 02 2020 11:49am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nil07



Member Since: 05 Apr 2015
Location: london
Posts: 115

United Kingdom 2013 Range Rover Sport SDV6 Autobiography Bonatti Grey
Svr super fuels

Anyone compared supermarket super petrol compared to BP/essay/shell for svr performance ?
I heard some supermarkets PetrolPrices has more ethanol compared to esso N

E46 M3
X6
2015 RRS HSE dynamic
2018 RRS Autobiography
2019 SVR

Post #604679 Sat Sep 19 2020 8:38pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Canary



Member Since: 23 Jan 2017
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 243

England 

I have tried time and time again giving super 2000 miles minimum in my SC v8 each time I get a new motor and its never made a jot of difference, I'm sure it makes a difference with other brands but not the current v8 in my eyes. MY18 SCV8 Satin flux silver
Gone:
MY19 SV VELAR AUTOBIOGRAPHY firenze red
MY18 SCV8 Yulong white- perfect 👍
MY16 SDV8 SANTORINI BLACK - perfect 👌
MY64 SCV8 DARK BLUE - nightmare car
MY64 SCV8 FIRENZE RED - loads of annoying issues
MY15 SDV6 FIRENZE RED - perfect 👌
MY12 SDV6 DISCO4 IPANEMA SAND - perfect 👌
MY09 TDV6 SPORT BLUE - lots of issues

Post #604749 Tue Sep 22 2020 9:37am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Smarttech



Member Since: 11 Jan 2017
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 424

United Kingdom 

I run my svr on normal unleaded shell petrol as I read somewhere the one of that SVO tech blokes said super wasn't required but if you felt better knowing it's on super unleaded then use it or just save the difference every time you filled up by sticking with normal good quality unleaded and not the cheaper supermarket fuels ! 2017 SVR. SVO Scafell grey Ebony interior
2012 3.0 SDV6 Autobiography santorini black with ebony/cirrus interior. Gone


Last edited by Smarttech on Tue Sep 22 2020 6:33pm. Edited 1 time in total

Post #604754 Tue Sep 22 2020 10:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
nil07



Member Since: 05 Apr 2015
Location: london
Posts: 115

United Kingdom 2013 Range Rover Sport SDV6 Autobiography Bonatti Grey

Good to know guys
Thanks N

E46 M3
X6
2015 RRS HSE dynamic
2018 RRS Autobiography
2019 SVR

Post #604764 Tue Sep 22 2020 1:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
naks



Member Since: 15 Jul 2016
Location: Stellenbosch
Posts: 1121

South Africa 2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Siberian Silver

Gents, I experienced a very weird consumption issue during this weekend's road trip: the last leg of our journey, which should have been the most fuel efficient, turned out to be the worst one!

Click image to enlarge



So yesterday (14th), we drove from Johannesburg to Colesberg, and the cruise control was on 130kmh, with ambient temps going from 20C at 7am to 30C at 2pm, and the overall consumption was brilliant, as you can see from refuels #2 and 3.

We stopped overnight, and then drove the last bit home today.

We left Hanover at 07:30 am, and it was colder than yesterday, and also the traffic was not as bad. Yet, as soon as we departed in the morning, I could see that the instantaneous consumption was looking a bit higher than the day before, but I thought I might be mistaken. The drive today was actually very cold in some places: 15C - 20C, and never got beyond 26C as we got nearer to Cape Town.

Yet when I refuelled just before we got home, the figures were bad - 13.43L/100km!!!

I drove the whole way, cruise control always on 130kmh, and even though today's weather was cooler AND we had less traffic, the consumption is worse!??? Shocked

Bear in mind that the drive on the 29th was uphill (sea level to 1600m), while the one on the 14th & 15th were downhill in the opposite direction, and that last figure is actually worse than it looks. Big Cry

any feedback would be most welcome, thanks --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport Supercharged V8 HSE Dynamic



Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

Post #610002 Mon Feb 15 2021 4:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8



Member Since: 13 Aug 2011
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 8834

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Sport SDV6 HSE Orkney Grey

Cooler air is denser, as is the air at sea level compared to 1600m. Denser air needs more fuel to burn correctly.

Just a guess.

Oh, and I love your characterisation of 15-20degC as "very cold". We've just had a few days where the mercury never got above zero degC and today we had 12degC and it felt positively summer-like. Cool Up in Scotland they've had -20degC (-23degC one night) which, although not as bad as some countries get, is still "very cold"! Shocked 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed

Post #610005 Mon Feb 15 2021 5:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
1richard1



Member Since: 10 Sep 2019
Location: oldbury
Posts: 178

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6 HSE Stornoway Grey

Did you factor in which way the wind was blowing?

Post #610006 Mon Feb 15 2021 6:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
naks



Member Since: 15 Jul 2016
Location: Stellenbosch
Posts: 1121

South Africa 2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Siberian Silver

IME, I've always gotten better consumption on colder days.

And yes, I realise the relative 'cold' - my measure is when my wife tells me she's cold Rolling with laughter --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport Supercharged V8 HSE Dynamic



Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

Post #610007 Mon Feb 15 2021 6:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
naks



Member Since: 15 Jul 2016
Location: Stellenbosch
Posts: 1121

South Africa 2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Siberian Silver

1richard1 wrote:
Did you factor in which way the wind was blowing?


I did: today there was a side wind (passenger to driver), moderate to strong. No headwind at all - the grass along the N1 is very tall at the moment, so it's easy to gauge the direction.

It really bugs me that even when I got on the road, I could tell that the consumption was higher just by looking at the instantaneous figures.... but I kept hoping I was wrong.

The difference is quite big when you consider 2L/100km over 634km: that's almost 13L, meaning I could get home on one tank instead of having to refuel just short of home Neutral

Also very frustrating having to refuel when the range shows 65km, and then only 85L goes in, meaning that there's another 20L in the tank. This would have been more than enough to get me home (115km) without refuelling. Confused --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport Supercharged V8 HSE Dynamic



Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

Post #610009 Mon Feb 15 2021 6:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
1richard1



Member Since: 10 Sep 2019
Location: oldbury
Posts: 178

United Kingdom 2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6 HSE Stornoway Grey

Also with the temps that will no doubt have an effect on tires and road surface temps, friction, tyres wear?

Post #610020 Mon Feb 15 2021 7:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
naks



Member Since: 15 Jul 2016
Location: Stellenbosch
Posts: 1121

South Africa 2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Siberian Silver

Hmm, I don't think so, because the day before the conditions were similar and the consumption was 11.41.

Even so, we're talking a +- 20% increase, which is a big difference! --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport Supercharged V8 HSE Dynamic



Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

Post #610047 Tue Feb 16 2021 7:20am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Grimble



Member Since: 21 Aug 2020
Location: Staffordshire
Posts: 224

United Kingdom 

For many years I did a long mostly motorway commute of approx 80miles each way. Before I got the RRS I hasten to add. By far the biggest factor was the wind direction. I always got a better mpg in one direction than the other even with the cruise set at exactly the same speed. I appreciate that these figures may not have been 'real world' accurate but as a comparative they should be reliable. Easily accounted for a 10% difference. The difference in consumption at 50mph compared with 77mph was remarkable, so you dont need much of a headwind to have a real impact. RRS HSE Dynamic SDV6 2014

Nemo mortalium omnibus horus sapit

Post #610066 Tue Feb 16 2021 12:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 4 <1234>
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site