RRSPORT.CO.UK • View topic - Suspension Lowering


		^ Advertise here ^ RRSPORT.CO.UK
		Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors

Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Suspension Lowering

Page 2 of 3

Bobby

Member Since: 07 Jun 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3781

2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Chawton White

Re: dropping

noddy and bigears wrote:
rrmad wrote:
its easy enough to drop it by 150mm but that would be twice as stupid as 75mm. Little benefit to touching it unless you are going to make further mods, spent days road testing suspension heights. These autologic boxes can get the uninitiated into trouble - I'd stick with the chipping TC.
can you fill us in more on your findings ie why a lower centre of gravity etc is of no benifit why is 75mm stupid etc some of us may like to know or is it just personal choice it could be an interesting thread thanks graham

Good one. Lowering at an earlier mph is certainly a good idea.
However, what do you think of lowering of 75mm at 50 mph? Your thoughts will benefit some of us. Malaysia Boleh!
4.2SC Chawton White, Stormers
Tasmod's Sills, Wind Deflectors, LR Sills
Clear Side Repeaters, Towbar
Larini Sports Exhaust, K&N Air Filter
______________________________
WINNER - 2008 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award
WINNER - 2009 Outstanding Contribution
WINNER - 2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award

Sat Jan 28 2006 6:41am

grommet

Member Since: 28 May 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 299

djsaad1 wrote:
I dont understand why the car lowers at 100. What happens at 100 that the car needs to be lower? How many times are you really cruising at 100 for long periods of time.

The engineers obviously determined that at over 100 MPH, there is a handling/control (maybe even aerodynamic) benefit to having the vehicle ride 20mm lower. Few will cruise over 100 MPH on-road, at least in North America... but this big and heavy monster still needs to be engineered for it's top speed.

Sat Jan 28 2006 7:24am

djsaad1

Member Since: 10 Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 254

2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Java Black

I understand that at high speeds it's probably more optimal for it to be lower, but why 100? why not 80? or 70? maybe they just don't want it to go up and down to often?

Sat Jan 28 2006 7:32am

LRtuning

Member Since: 26 Jul 2005
Location: London and Melbourne
Posts: 403

2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Cairns Blue

Never thought of myself as a 'weekend' engineer Chips with everything

Sat Jan 28 2006 5:52pm

RRUK

Member Since: 10 Jun 2005
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 2574

2013 Range Rover Sport Supercharged Autobiography Stornoway Grey

I agree, 100 mph is a stupid speed for LR tos et this feature at, 50mph and upwards is much better, it is afterall the way the full size RR is set.

Who can and would cruise for long periods of time at over 100MPH? or could afford the fuel in a SC to do that! L319 D4 HSE

1998 110 TUM HS FFR Hard Top XD WOLF

1982 Series 3 SWB

Sun Jan 29 2006 5:47pm

LRtuning

Member Since: 26 Jul 2005
Location: London and Melbourne
Posts: 403

Exactly....I think the RRS would handle a lot better on UK roads if the suspension was 'allowed' to lower at 50 mph rather than 100mph that LR think is best!!

I'll keep members posted

PS I'm going back to my 'weekend engineer' shed now Chips with everything

Sun Jan 29 2006 5:58pm

Pelyma

Member Since: 29 Sep 2005
Location: Sussex
Posts: 1497

turbochip wrote:
Exactly....I think the RRS would handle a lot better

I presume you know rather than think

Sun Jan 29 2006 7:27pm

LRtuning

Member Since: 26 Jul 2005
Location: London and Melbourne
Posts: 403

I do indeed Chips with everything

Sun Jan 29 2006 8:13pm

l

Member Since: 11 Jun 2005
Location: Valencia
Posts: 232

2006 Range Rover Sport TDV6 HSE Buckingham Blue

Well I am very happy with my tdv6 at the moment so if there is an option to improve it I am more than interested RRS TDV6 HSE BUCKINGHAM BLUE BLACK LEATHER INTERIOR RHODIUM TASMOD SILLS PARROT 3000 EVOLUTION WHITE SIDE REPEATERS RRPORT.CO.UK BROLLY & STICKER
HOW GOOD IS THIS CAR!!!!
8 YEARS AND STILL GETTING LOOKS

Sun Jan 29 2006 8:16pm

LRtuning

Member Since: 26 Jul 2005
Location: London and Melbourne
Posts: 403

I'll keep you informed;-) Chips with everything

Sun Jan 29 2006 8:19pm

MDP

Member Since: 15 Jun 2005
Location: Back in an AUDI
Posts: 8598

It all makes sense - a more "SQUAT" RRS at reasonable speeds of 50mph upwards.

Please keep us all posted TC
" WITH MORE EXTRAS THAN A HOLLYWOOD EPIC "

Sun Jan 29 2006 8:53pm

rrmad

Member Since: 29 Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 44

Re: dropping

noddy and bigears wrote:
rrmad wrote:
its easy enough to drop it by 150mm but that would be twice as stupid as 75mm. Little benefit to touching it unless you are going to make further mods, spent days road testing suspension heights. These autologic boxes can get the uninitiated into trouble - I'd stick with the chipping TC.
can you fill us in more on your findings ie why a lower centre of gravity etc is of no benifit why is 75mm stupid etc some of us may like to know or is it just personal choice it could be an interesting thread thanks graham

Will answer in a bit more detail when I can stand still for 5 mins , very busy at the moment. a fully loaded sport fouls a rear tyre @ - 75mm on a fully loaded car it was a wet day so we didn't find witness marks on wheelarch but we all heard it. I will share our findings later on and they are right lowering at 100mph does seem crazy but it is clearly areodynamic.

Mon Jan 30 2006 3:00pm

noddy and bigears

Member Since: 05 Nov 2005
Location: hants
Posts: 116

any luck

just thought i would keep this active

Thu Feb 09 2006 12:19am

Bobby

Member Since: 07 Jun 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3781

Re: any luck

noddy and bigears wrote:
just thought i would keep this active

Yes, I'm still waiting for your answer too.
Your learned input would be very valuable to us. Malaysia Boleh!
4.2SC Chawton White, Stormers
Tasmod's Sills, Wind Deflectors, LR Sills
Clear Side Repeaters, Towbar
Larini Sports Exhaust, K&N Air Filter
______________________________
WINNER - 2008 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award
WINNER - 2009 Outstanding Contribution
WINNER - 2009 'Tech-Head Of The Year' Award

Thu Feb 09 2006 1:08am

Michael997

Member Since: 31 Jan 2006
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 225

I would also like my RRS to drop at a more common speed of 50mph ish as I am unlikely to top the 100mph very often in the RRS Michael
2013 RRS diesel Autobiography Dynamic

Sat Feb 11 2006 7:24pm

Page 2 of 3

All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to

< Previous Topic | Next Topic >

Posting Rules

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum