RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
| Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
| Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > TDV6 or TDV8? Pros and cons? |
|
|
|
|
| flydive Member Since: 17 May 2007 Location: South Posts: 1213
|
TDV8(+BAS)
|
||
|
| flydive Member Since: 17 May 2007 Location: South Posts: 1213
|
The above are not from the on-board computer, but actual calculations.
|
||
|
| RRS Daz Member Since: 23 Jan 2012 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 797 |
That's interesting. |
||
|
| roscopcoltrane Member Since: 31 May 2013 Location: Scotland Posts: 86
|
On a recent 780 mile round trip from Scotland to Gloucestershire, I averaged , real MPG, 30.1, this was door to door and was 80% on motorway at well.......... I averaged 70.4 MPH door to door as well. This is in a TDV8 with Superchip thingy. A lot better than my FF TD6 and on MWay was easily in mid 30s.
|
||
|
| RRSTDV8 Member Since: 13 Aug 2011 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 9112
|
Motorway driving is a great way to get good mpg figures. Using the range figure from the computer, tooling around locally I get a projected 340 miles for a full tank so that's 19mpg. (It was about 300 miles prior to a BAS remap by the way). On a quick 140mile round trip yesterday on the A43 and M1 I got a projected range of 470 miles. That's about 26mpg. If it had just been motorway (the A43 has a number of roundabouts which leads to greater fuel use) then I'd have seen over 500 miles on the computer. Motorway driving was at "a bit more" than 70mph |
||
|
| roscopcoltrane Member Since: 31 May 2013 Location: Scotland Posts: 86
|
Interestingly, based on the computer, if I travel at 70MPH which is approx 1900/2000 RPM I get less MPG than at 85MPH at approx 2300/2400 RPM, not sure if this is due to the superchip thingy, thought originally it was an anomaly but real calculations bare it out
|
||
|
| RRS Daz Member Since: 23 Jan 2012 Location: Yorkshire Posts: 797 |
^^^ so even if you work it out properly, it proves better to drive faster to get better mpg?! |
||
|
| roscopcoltrane Member Since: 31 May 2013 Location: Scotland Posts: 86
|
Daz, I am not technical however something happens at 2100 rpm, dont know if its turbos or the Remap, but uses less fuel at 2200/2300 rpm than at 1900/2000 rpm, just is magnified on a motorway and easily judged as you are travelling for longer at a steady RPM. Looking at the power curve 2100 rpm seems to be a significant point which you can feel under acceleration, in the old days I would call it the cam |
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![]()






