RRSPORT.CO.UK |
||
| Forum Gallery Shop Sponsors |
| Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Members Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In |
![]() | Home > General > RR vs RRS |
|
|
|
|
| thebishman Member Since: 21 Dec 2005 Location: Kansas, USA Posts: 98
|
The RRS weighs more than the RR.
|
||
|
| Jeffrey Member Since: 03 Feb 2006 Location: California, USA Posts: 23
|
One tenth of a second difference? Pretty much rounds off to zero. '06 RRS Giverny/Alpaca
|
||
|
| rrmad Member Since: 29 Oct 2005 Location: UK Posts: 44
|
RR is lighter with a few more BHP and anyway it is in LR's interest to have the best performance on their flagship - 0.1 sec it has to be the same in real life! |
||
|
| byron Member Since: 06 Jan 2006 Location: Athens Posts: 91
|
Agree but still since they made a car with the word sport in its name I guess performance should be its best asset.Anyway... |
||
|
| grommet Member Since: 28 May 2005 Location: Northern California Posts: 299
|
Really, no vehicle that is as big and weighs as much as the RRS should be associated with the term "Sport." |
||
|
| sportman Member Since: 25 Jul 2005 Location: UAE Posts: 550
|
what i know that RRS has 390 Bhp on the other had RR has 10 Bhp extra total 400 Bhp can any one explain why and how? |
||
|
| avus Member Since: 31 Jan 2006 Location: chi-city Posts: 16
|
from what i heard, the difference is solely based on the exhaust system. they said since it the RR is longer it has more 'exit breathing' room. but, i too assume it is just a marketing ploy for its flagship to have best performance. |
||
|
| RRUK Member Since: 10 Jun 2005 Location: Leicestershire Posts: 2589
|
Count yourself lucky you don't have a SC RR as the exhausts looks SO silly, I saw another one the other day, they look like two little pipes taken from something like a Morris Minor! L319 D4 HSE
|
||
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2005-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
![]()









