RRSPORT.CO.UK

    Forum   Gallery   Shop   Sponsors
Home > General > TDV6 or TDV8? Pros and cons?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 3 of 3 <123
 
flydive



Member Since: 17 May 2007
Location: South
Posts: 1213

Switzerland 2008 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

TDV8(+BAS)

Calculated over 57000Km, highway, normal roads, city, off-road.

Average 22 MPG

On long highway runs I get around 28 MPG(even a bit more) '08 RRS TDV8
I converted my diesel RRS to run on an environmentally friendly mixture of caribou fat and baby seals oil

Post #393415 Sat Aug 31 2013 9:10am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRS Daz



Member Since: 23 Jan 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 797

OK

2.7 24mpg 12,000 miles at £139.9 = £3179.9
3.6 22mpg 12,000 miles at £139.9 = £3469

I though you could get at least 30mpg on motorway driving.

Post #393419 Sat Aug 31 2013 9:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
flydive



Member Since: 17 May 2007
Location: South
Posts: 1213

Switzerland 2008 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Stornoway Grey

The above are not from the on-board computer, but actual calculations.

If I remove the few spikes of very high consumption due to off-roading or other abnormal situations, I would say the average would be closer to 24MPG.

Also, my car has the DPF which does not help MPG.

I owned a TDV6, I would say that there is no appreciable difference in MPG. '08 RRS TDV8
I converted my diesel RRS to run on an environmentally friendly mixture of caribou fat and baby seals oil

Post #393420 Sat Aug 31 2013 9:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRS Daz



Member Since: 23 Jan 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 797

flydive wrote:

I owned a TDV6, I would say that there is no appreciable difference in MPG.


That's interesting.

Post #393421 Sat Aug 31 2013 10:03am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
roscopcoltrane



Member Since: 31 May 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 83

2008 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Zermatt Silver

On a recent 780 mile round trip from Scotland to Gloucestershire, I averaged , real MPG, 30.1, this was door to door and was 80% on motorway at well.......... I averaged 70.4 MPH door to door as well. This is in a TDV8 with Superchip thingy. A lot better than my FF TD6 and on MWay was easily in mid 30s.

Computer was not far out, approx 5% optimistic

Post #393423 Sat Aug 31 2013 10:37am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRSTDV8



Member Since: 13 Aug 2011
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 8850

United Kingdom 2012 Range Rover Sport SDV6 HSE Orkney Grey

Motorway driving is a great way to get good mpg figures. Using the range figure from the computer, tooling around locally I get a projected 340 miles for a full tank so that's 19mpg. (It was about 300 miles prior to a BAS remap by the way). On a quick 140mile round trip yesterday on the A43 and M1 I got a projected range of 470 miles. That's about 26mpg. If it had just been motorway (the A43 has a number of roundabouts which leads to greater fuel use) then I'd have seen over 500 miles on the computer. Motorway driving was at "a bit more" than 70mph Whistle using ACC for much of the time.

Drive at a steady 70mph and I'd expect to see nearer to 28mpg or more. 2012 SDV6 - it's missing a couple of cylinders
2008 TDV8 - it was a labour of love and is much missed

Post #393428 Sat Aug 31 2013 11:36am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
roscopcoltrane



Member Since: 31 May 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 83

2008 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Zermatt Silver

Interestingly, based on the computer, if I travel at 70MPH which is approx 1900/2000 RPM I get less MPG than at 85MPH at approx 2300/2400 RPM, not sure if this is due to the superchip thingy, thought originally it was an anomaly but real calculations bare it out

Obviously not on UK roads Very Happy

Post #393429 Sat Aug 31 2013 11:46am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RRS Daz



Member Since: 23 Jan 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 797

^^^ so even if you work it out properly, it proves better to drive faster to get better mpg?!

Post #393432 Sat Aug 31 2013 1:32pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
roscopcoltrane



Member Since: 31 May 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 83

2008 Range Rover Sport TDV8 HSE Zermatt Silver

Daz, I am not technical however something happens at 2100 rpm, dont know if its turbos or the Remap, but uses less fuel at 2200/2300 rpm than at 1900/2000 rpm, just is magnified on a motorway and easily judged as you are travelling for longer at a steady RPM. Looking at the power curve 2100 rpm seems to be a significant point which you can feel under acceleration, in the old days I would call it the cam Very Happy

Post #393434 Sat Aug 31 2013 2:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 3 of 3 <123
All times are GMT + 1 Hour

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2005-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
RRSPORT.CO.UK RSS Feed - All Forums

Switch to Mobile site