simmikie
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 25

|
| Re: Land Cruiser or Range Rover Sport? | |
gribnau wrote:
Oh yeah, this is going to be an enlightening pole, with most of the members long time LR fanatics (did I say that?) and own or are hours from owning an RRS!
Personally I am torn, there things I like about the LC, there are things I like about the RRS. The RRS is ahead by a nose as it is actually closer to what I want in a 4x4. Having no off-road or 4x4 experience Terrain Response is perfect for me, though I doubt I'll ever use anything past Grass, Gravel, Snow. I like the low learning curve it offers. By contrast the LC system, I have no concept of how to use it in varying weather conditions.
The RRS is "pretty" in a sporting way, but the LC, in it's staid ultra conservative, boring styling is kind of exceptional looking (to me anyway). Being a "road warrior" I drive quite a bit and like the extra convenience features of the RRS, like rain sensors, bi-xenon, PTI (I need a rolling office), and all the testers comments on it's long range cruising attributes. On the other hand, I have driven the LC, and it is absolutely confidence inspiring. It has an aire of being able to go anywhere at anytime and do anything, and for it's bulk handled and rode amazingly well. After that first test drive I could not get the smile from my face for days! I loved it!! I did not say I do right then and there, for one I have never spent that kind of money on an automobile, I do not need an 8 passenger, I hate the slung off to the side back seats, or having to remove and store them and then living with the holes in the loadspace. Also I thought 235 bhp is pretty puny for a 5500 pound truck.....enter the RRS.
I am leaning slightly to the RRS, mainly for it's power, 4x4 system, comfort and convenience equipment, and it's unique Marquee and styling. My big concern is LR itself, if there is one thing that organization truly excels at, it is shooting themselves in the foot!
simmikie
|